The National Football League this year has made player safety, especially quarterback safety, a point of emphasis. As a result more flags have been thrown, the penalties have been increased, and the players are angrier because of the changing standards and the officials not letting them play.
The Wall Street Journal in 2009 questioned whether we should have helmets at all. The helmets, while they protect from injury, give players a sense of invulnerability, and players (famously, Gus Ferrote) have injured themselves while relying on the helmet’s promise of safety.
I have an interesting idea:
- Have players choose between no helmet and a soft helmet, like leather.
- Have quarterbacks choose between no helmet, a soft helmet, and a hard helmet that removes easily.
- If the quarterback chooses the hard helmet, he may not cross the line of scrimmage with the helmet on. He may take it off and run. Once he makes a move to remove the helmet, the helmet must come off. No fakes. No use of the helmet as a weapon; instant ejection.
I imagine if you have a mobile quarterback, e.g. Michael Vick, he would opt for either no helmet or soft helmet, because he is always a running threat. Quarterbacks like Matt Cassel who only scramble on 3rd and 10 with everyone deep would be free to run, shed the helmet, and go forward. If the QB sheds the helmet and doesn’t make it to the line of scrimmage, that was his risk.
The QB shouldn’t have today’s helmet while advancing the ball because running forward he could use the helmet as a weapon: something we are looking to avoid.
This way John Elway could take his flying leap and yet be protected most of the game.
Thoughts?


