<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s the Up Side on Cloned Meat?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://necessaryroughness.org/archives/937/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://necessaryroughness.org/archives/937</link>
	<description>two kingdoms, hundreds of thousands of miles</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 02:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cal</title>
		<link>http://necessaryroughness.org/archives/937#comment-8045</link>
		<dc:creator>Cal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 21:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://necessaryroughness.org/archives/937#comment-8045</guid>
		<description>You've sort of missed the point. You don't clone animals for meat production. You clone specific animals for breeding. Given the value of sperm from particularly impressive animal specimens, the price tag for cloning makes a lot more sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve sort of missed the point. You don&#8217;t clone animals for meat production. You clone specific animals for breeding. Given the value of sperm from particularly impressive animal specimens, the price tag for cloning makes a lot more sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
