<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Muslim Rep Wants To Swear In on Koran</title>
	<atom:link href="http://necessaryroughness.org/archives/894/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://necessaryroughness.org/archives/894</link>
	<description>two kingdoms, hundreds of thousands of miles</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 15:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://necessaryroughness.org/archives/894#comment-6023</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 02:21:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://necessaryroughness.org/archives/894#comment-6023</guid>
		<description>Yeah, but on the other hand, the Bible doesn't bind hid conscience.  The Koran does.

But the simple fact remains: For Muslims, the law of the Koran is to be saught above all secular laws.  He can not truthfuly swear on ANY book that he will support and defend the Constitution of the United States.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, but on the other hand, the Bible doesn&#8217;t bind hid conscience.  The Koran does.</p>
<p>But the simple fact remains: For Muslims, the law of the Koran is to be saught above all secular laws.  He can not truthfuly swear on ANY book that he will support and defend the Constitution of the United States.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
