http://necessaryroughness.org/archives/890 two kingdoms, hundreds of thousands of miles Sat, 05 Jul 2008 02:29:50 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 http://necessaryroughness.org/archives/890#comment-5975 Dan Tue, 28 Nov 2006 03:36:56 +0000 http://necessaryroughness.org/archives/890#comment-5975 I suppose. I wonder how easy it would be for these properties to split in two, a restaurant and a smokers' lounge. Or partner up with a neighboring restaurant. If these customers are willing to put the time in on these places, they'll either bring in their own food or smoke more. I suppose. I wonder how easy it would be for these properties to split in two, a restaurant and a smokers’ lounge. Or partner up with a neighboring restaurant. If these customers are willing to put the time in on these places, they’ll either bring in their own food or smoke more.

]]> http://necessaryroughness.org/archives/890#comment-5972 Scott Mon, 27 Nov 2006 13:18:38 +0000 http://necessaryroughness.org/archives/890#comment-5972 Your conclusion that the place is "more dangerous" doesn't necessarily follow. They have finagled a way to increase the *percentage of sales* of tobacco, but it doesn't say that the on-site consumption has increased a stitch. Your conclusion that the place is “more dangerous” doesn’t necessarily follow. They have finagled a way to increase the *percentage of sales* of tobacco, but it doesn’t say that the on-site consumption has increased a stitch.

]]>