February 7th, 2008 at 12:32 pm
On the way to work I was listening to The Glenn Beck Program, which was hosting representatives from various parties. I caught his interview with Jim Clymer, president of the Constitution Party. Part of the interview was entertaining, as Beck was playing sultry music while Clymer described the party’s wish to abolish the IRS.
Beck asked him if he thought President Bush brought down the World Trade Center on 9/11. To my shock, Clymer waffled. Eventually he got around to a reasonable answer, but it seemed like he was struggling with a desire not to say anything positive about the President. In the end Clymer said that personally he found it preposterous that Bush lied about 9/11, but there are some in the party that do.
There is enough difference between President Bush and the original values of the Constitution that nobody needs to say he lied. It is possible and desirable to disagree with policies that are in place without taking the kook road and saying he lied about 9/11. The high road must be held without surrender.
If I were Clymer, the first response to getting asked whether Bush lied about 9/11 and conspired to take down the towers would have been, “I don’t want to believe that. I think the President has good intentions, but we’ve deviated from the kind of liberty-loving country that follows the Constitution — the country we had been and are meant to be again.” Get off the past which we don’t control, and sell the future.

February 7th, 2008 at 5:57 pm
You would say that, but you’ve had the luxury of time to think about it. Blame Beck for bringing it up…
At least Clymer was honest about what he knew some folks were thinking.
February 7th, 2008 at 6:32 pm
Sure, I “Monday-morning-quarterbacked” it, but “I don’t want to believe that,” came right away. It doesn’t take a lot of time to put the best construction on something. Unfortunately, going on Glenn Beck is probably going to be the best free publicity the Constitution Party is going to get, since Hannity or Limbaugh probably wouldn’t have a guest from the Constitution Party.
February 8th, 2008 at 10:19 am
I don’t think the question was all that difficult. Either you believe it, or you don’t. And responding to questions off-the-cuff is part of appearing in public venues. You need to be prepared.
February 8th, 2008 at 5:13 pm
Clymer is right regarding the IRS, though.
It is getting to the point where the single biggest use of our tax dollars is to collect tax. In this day and age there are much better and simpler (and fairer) ways to tax our poplulation.
IE: http://fairtaxgroups.com/
February 9th, 2008 at 2:03 pm
‘population’, even
February 11th, 2008 at 9:32 am
The Constitution Party has plank in their platform supporting pretty extreme trade protectionism.
That’s one thing I really disagree with. I plan on voting for them as long as it is a protest vote showing support for the Constitution, but that plank is insanely bad.