<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cheer Up, Dems, You&#8217;re Helping the Country</title>
	<atom:link href="http://necessaryroughness.org/archives/1396/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://necessaryroughness.org/archives/1396</link>
	<description>two kingdoms, hundreds of thousands of miles</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 02:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://necessaryroughness.org/archives/1396#comment-13886</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 17:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://necessaryroughness.org/archives/1396#comment-13886</guid>
		<description>The thing is, passing the AMT patch is not a tax decrease -- it merely maintains the status quo ante. The Democrat's argument was disingenuous.

As for the Laffer curve, I believe it as a theoretical matter. But I'm agnostic as to which side we're on. I haven't seen good evidence for either view.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing is, passing the AMT patch is not a tax decrease &#8212; it merely maintains the status quo ante. The Democrat&#8217;s argument was disingenuous.</p>
<p>As for the Laffer curve, I believe it as a theoretical matter. But I&#8217;m agnostic as to which side we&#8217;re on. I haven&#8217;t seen good evidence for either view.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
