I wonder sometimes if social liberals in Portland, Maine, hate sex, or perhaps don’t realize that they do.

Sure, one could argue that those pursuing the city’s health officials dispensing birth control pills to 11-year-olds potentially without the knowledge of parents might be seeking to grant that pleasure to everyone.

But what of the effects? How jaded are some of these kids going to be, sexually active for six or seven years before they graduate from high school? The fun and bonding spent in honeymoon, wasted on another kid or worse, a pedophile?

The city’s residents should be outright offended that their tax dollars are being taken from them to promote risky behavior. Even if a girl needs hormonal regulation for a medical condition, that is the responsibility of the parents.

We recognize that kids do not have the maturity of adults. You have to be 25 to rent a car on your own name. 21 to drink. 18 to vote and serve in the armed forces. Then someone decides that 11-year-olds can be mature enough to govern something so life-altering as sexual intercourse? You can be expected to handle sex at less than half the age people expect you to handle renting a car?

We need not excite in children desires that are still difficult to govern in adults.

If a couple is having sex they should protect that behavior in a monogamous marriage, even if they are young. The risk of disease transmission, pregnancy without two committed parents, and the emotional harm of the breakup of sexual partners drastically reduces the chance of those people realizing the full benefits of the institution that God has set for us.

That’s why I say they hate sex. Sex can be done in such a way that both partners will be happy with each other for a very long time. By exciting these children and saddling them with adult responsibilities, they ruin sex for these people when they are mature enough to handle it.


1 Point2 Points3 Points4 Points5 Points (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...